Sunday 1 November 2026International EditionRSS
The financial daily of the startup economy
Fintech

The SEC's innovation exemption opens a narrow, capped lane for tokenized US stocks

A five-year order lets blockchain venues trade tokenized shares outside exchange rules, but symbol and volume caps make it a supervised experiment rather than a new stock market.

Engraving for: The SEC's innovation exemption opens a narrow, capped lane for tokenized US stocks
Illustration: InvestTimes

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday, September 17, granted what it calls an "Innovation Exemption" for the trading of tokenized American shares. The order gives qualifying blockchain venues five years of conditional relief from the definition of "exchange" in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and gives liquidity providers on those venues a parallel exemption from the definition of "dealer". In plain terms, a platform can now let permissioned users swap tokenized versions of listed stocks through automated market makers and liquidity pools, the machinery of decentralised finance, without registering as a stock exchange.

It is the most concrete step yet in the agency's effort to bring securities on-chain, and it arrived in a week when the legislative route had stalled. Chairman Paul Atkins tied the order explicitly to the failure in Congress earlier that week to advance the CLARITY Act. Unable to wait for a statute, the SEC has used its own exemptive authority to build a temporary framework. For crypto exchanges, brokerages and the startups that sell them infrastructure, the question is how much business can fit inside it.

What the order permits

The order creates a new category, the Tokenized Securities Venue, defined as an organisation that brings together buyers and sellers of tokenized NMS stock by providing pools in which permissioned participants trade, and by setting the standards for who may access them. Tokenized NMS stock can be issued by, or on behalf of, the company itself, or created by an unaffiliated third party. Synthetic products, such as tokens that merely give price exposure to a share, are expressly excluded.

The conditions are substantial. A venue must verify that a tokenized share carries the same rights and privileges as the traditional share of an equivalent class, including dividends and voting. Before listing a token created by a third party, it must give the underlying company written notice and an opportunity to object. Smart contracts must be auditable, public and deployed on a public, permissionless ledger. Trading must stop whenever the underlying stock is halted on its primary exchange. At least 30 calendar days before operating, a venue must publish a notice on its website and then inform the Commission. Atkins also stressed that venues must be US persons and comply with sanctions rules, and that "the anti-fraud and anti-manipulation provisions of the federal securities laws apply in full".

The caps are the real story

The most telling provisions are numerical. The order sorts tokenized shares into two tiers borrowed from the market's Limit Up Limit Down plan. Tier 1 covers the most liquid names, including the constituents of the S&P 500 and Russell 1000 indices. A venue may trade no more than 75 Tier 1 symbols, and its volume in any of them may not exceed 0.25 percent of that stock's average daily share volume in the prior month. For Tier 2, the limits are 250 symbols and 2.5 percent. Affiliated venues must aggregate their numbers, so a company cannot split itself into several platforms to escape the caps.

Those thresholds define the business opportunity. A quarter of one percent of daily volume in a heavily traded large company is not trivial in absolute terms, but it rules out any venue becoming a primary marketplace for blue chips during the life of the order. The SEC is plainly inviting a controlled experiment: enough activity to generate evidence, not enough to move price discovery away from the national market system. The order itself asks for comment on whether the limits are set correctly, which suggests they may move.

Who is positioned to use it

The obvious candidates are crypto platforms that already offer tokenized equities abroad. SiliconANGLE noted that Coinbase, Robinhood and Gemini have launched tokenized stock trading outside the United States but have held back at home, signalling that they would move once the regulatory position was clear. The order also matters for a long tail of startups: tokenization agents, on-chain market makers, custody and identity providers, and analytics firms that would supply the compliance plumbing a venue now needs, from access controls to public disclosure of its own and its affiliates' trading.

The dealer exemption is equally significant for that ecosystem. Liquidity providers using their own capital, quoting prices and committing capital, can operate in the pools without registering as dealers, provided their securities activity is limited to these venues. That lowers the cost of entry for specialised trading firms, while confining them to a ring-fenced corner of the market.

What remains unresolved

The exemption is, by its own terms, temporary. It expires five years after publication, and Atkins wrote that "this interim measure must be followed by durable rulemaking". A future Commission could narrow or decline to extend it, and the failure of the CLARITY Act means there is no statute to anchor the framework. Builders will be investing on the strength of an order rather than a law.

The issuer objection right is another constraint. Companies that do not want their shares wrapped in a third-party token can say no, and large issuers with cautious legal departments may do exactly that, at least initially. Finally, the exemption covers trading venues, not the regulatory status of everyone who participates: the order notes that participants may still face registration requirements depending on what they do.

Our view

This is a sensible piece of regulatory design and a modest commercial prize. The SEC has chosen to let tokenized equity trading happen in the open, on public ledgers, with full shareholder rights and hard caps, rather than either banning it or blessing it wholesale. That is a better outcome for investors than the offshore wrappers that have filled the gap so far.

For founders, the opportunity lies less in running venues, which favours well-capitalised incumbents with compliance teams, than in supplying them: issuer-authorised tokenization, permissioning, surveillance and reporting tools. For investors, valuation cases built on tokenized stocks displacing traditional exchanges should be discounted heavily; the caps make that impossible for now. What to watch is the comment file, the first venue notices, and whether major issuers choose to tokenize their own shares. Issuer participation, more than any crypto exchange launch, will show whether this experiment can graduate into a market.

Sources

Filed under Fintech. Written by InvestTimes Editorial under our editorial standards. Commentary and analysis for information only, not investment advice.